进入     离开

Coda XXX

While a government-subsidized public education campaign could counter harmful sexist messages, a ban on pornography would restrict the deepest speech of its authors and consumers. Therefore, it may be a good idea for the executive to advertise a public debate in regards to the harms of pornography. Traditionally, liberals have defended the correct of pornography to exist. While some of these defenders disagree about even if the harm is enormous enough to justify restrictions on the industry, most liberals agree that pornography causes some harm to women. Some conservatives argue that pornography is morally faulty and may be banned. However, others have argued that a ban would not do any good. Instead, a more advantageous way to address the problem of sexual inequality could be to think about getting better women's lives. Another group of advocates is the feminists. While they do not share the conservatives' desire to ban pornography, they do agree that the industry preys on inclined populations, particularly women. They also agree with that pornography has the capabilities to undermine the equal civil rights of ladies. A number of liberals have proposed that the "harm principle" can be a basis for censorship.
14.02.2023